If you spend any time around deal lawyers or private-equity principals, you’ll hear the phrase “indemnity basket” tossed out with the same casual confidence as “term sheet” or “closing dinner.” But for many people—even seasoned executives—the concept can feel a little abstract until real dollars are at stake. Because indemnity baskets govern when a buyer can claw money back from a seller, they sit at the heart of most mergers and acquisitions (M&A) negotiations.

Handled well, a basket smooths the path to signing. Handled poorly, it can leave one side feeling nickeled-and-dimed, or the other side dangerously exposed. Let’s unpack why this small contractual feature deserves a big place in your deal playbook.

What Exactly Is an Indemnity Basket?

Think of an indemnity basket as the financial threshold a buyer must clear before it can dip into the seller’s pocket for post-closing losses. The premise is simple: minor hiccups—like a $700 unpaid invoice discovered after closing—shouldn’t trigger a full-blown indemnification claim. Instead, the parties agree that only when aggregate losses cross a predetermined dollar amount will the buyer have a right to recover.

The logic mirrors an insurance deductible. Just as you wouldn’t file a claim for a $10 scratch on your car, the buyer shouldn’t sue over trivial contract breaches. The basket filters the noise, ensuring only material issues command everyone’s time and money.

Two Flavors: Deductible vs. Tipping

Not all baskets behave the same way. In the wild, you’ll see two dominant species:

• Deductible (or “true basket”) – Losses are absorbed by the buyer until the basket is met. Amounts above that threshold are recoverable, but the buyer still eats the first dollars.
• Tipping (or “first-dollar basket”) – Once losses exceed the basket, the entire amount—including the first dollars—tips over to the seller’s side of the table.
  

Sellers naturally favor the deductible model; buyers lean toward tipping. Which version prevails depends on bargaining power, risk profile, and—let’s be honest—who’s hungrier for the deal.

Why Do We Even Need a Basket?

Deals generate paperwork—lots of it—and no matter how careful the diligence, small discrepancies lurk. Maybe a vendor contract auto-renews at a higher rate, or an employee’s accrued vacation days were miscounted.

Without a basket, each of these micro-issues could spiral into legal back-and-forth, souring the post-closing relationship. By agreeing in advance that “we won’t bother each other until losses reach, say, $250,000,” both sides buy peace of mind and reduce legal friction.

Negotiating the Size: Big Enough to Matter, Small Enough to Clear

There’s no universal basket number etched in stone tablets. Instead, the right figure balances two competing instincts. The seller wants a buffer large enough to prevent death by a thousand paper cuts. The buyer wants a hurdle low enough that it’s not forced to shoulder material risks solo.

Market data offers rough guideposts: baskets commonly sit between 0.5% and 1.0% of enterprise value in middle-market deals, with percentages drifting lower as deal size grows. Yet those statistics are merely conversation starters. If the target’s industry is heavily regulated, or if diligence surfaced thorny tax exposures, the buyer may push for a slender basket—or even separate “mini-baskets” for specific risks.

Typical Benchmarks in the Market

• Sub-$100 million deals: 0.75%–1.5% of purchase price
  
• $100 million–$500 million deals: 0.5%–1.0%
  
• $500 million+ deals: 0.25%–0.5%
  

These figures shift with economic cycles. In frothy seller-friendly markets, baskets creep larger; in downturns, buyers claw them back.

Carve-Outs: When the Basket Doesn’t Apply

Even the most lenient seller accepts that certain sins shouldn’t hide behind a basket. Common carve-outs include:

• Fraud or intentional misconduct
  
• Fundamental reps (ownership of shares, authority to sign, capitalization)
  
• Certain tax, environmental, or employee-benefit liabilities
  
• Breaches of covenants to deliver closing items (for example, payoff letters)
  

Carve-outs ensure that existential threats pierce the basket instantly. They’re also a useful safety valve when parties feel the headline basket number is trending too high.

Practical Tips for Buyers and Sellers

For Sellers: Protect the Purchase Price

• Keep caps and baskets linked. A generous basket paired with a tight cap prevents double jeopardy.
  
• Negotiate for a deductible basket if leverage allows. It limits exposure to true over-the-line losses.
  
• Document carve-outs narrowly. Broad fraud carve-outs can create back-door claims for ordinary negligence.
  
• Align survival periods with the basket. If most reps expire after 12–18 months, you’re not on the hook forever.
  

For Buyers: Keep Your Safety Net Real

• Focus on aggregate exposure. A low basket coupled with a lofty cap may yield more practical protection than vice-versa.
  
• Demand specific carve-outs when diligence flags recurring issues (for example, misclassified contractors).
  
• Watch out for undisclosed deductibles lurking in separate schedules. Some sellers attempt to launder liabilities that way.
  
• Coordinate with your R&W insurance broker. Insurers often mirror the underlying basket, so your policy’s retention should dovetail with deal terms.
  

Final Thoughts

An indemnity basket is only one slice of the risk-allocation pie. Survival periods, caps, escrow holdbacks, and reps-and-warranties insurance all weave together to form the post-closing safety net. Yet because a basket sets the first line of defense—deciding when minor annoyances become actionable losses—it shapes the tenor of the entire indemnification regime.

Nail it, and both buyer and seller can focus on growing the business rather than litigating pennies. Miss it, and the smallest glitch can turn goodwill into grievance. So pour a fresh coffee, sharpen your pencil, and give that basket the attention it deserves. Your future self will thank you when you realize people only pay you back if they really mean it.

‍